Hi Nicolas,

On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 10:51 AM, Nicolas Cellier <nicolas.cellier.aka.nice@gmail.com> wrote:

Hi Igor,
isn't the convention to add oscog, like VMMaker-oscog-Igor.Stasenko.37
? (not sure about how the dot between first and last names will be
interpreted though).

actually I asked Igor to upload that so that I can integrate his finalization changes into the oscog line.  BTW, I just edit the name in the publish dialog, replacing eem with oscog and I all too often forget (hence VMMaker-eem.35 this weekend).  I'm still keen to use oscog for "official" versions of Cog that I have blessed, probably up until we've merged the VMMakers, at which point oscog will become an obsolete name.


best
Eliot

Nicolas

2010/10/6  <squeak-dev-noreply@lists.squeakfoundation.org>:
>
> Igor Stasenko uploaded a new version of VMMaker to project VM Maker:
> http://www.squeaksource.com/VMMaker/VMMaker-Igor.Stasenko.37.mcz
>
> ==================== Summary ====================
>
> Name: VMMaker-Igor.Stasenko.37
> Author: Igor.Stasenko
> Time: 6 October 2010, 8:36:31 am
> UUID: 6fcf9560-ff1b-fc47-9e20-044051722a5b
> Ancestors: VMMaker-oscog.36
>
> integration of finalization enhancements for Cog VM
>
> (ignore the Interpreter changes, when merging)
>
>