On 21 Jun 2017, at 23:07, Eliot Miranda <eliot.miranda@gmail.com> wrote:Hi Cyril, Hi Alex,On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 8:08 AM, Cyril Ferlicot <cyril.ferlicot@gmail.com> wrote:On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 5:04 PM, Eliot Miranda <eliot.miranda@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Clément
>
>
> That was a mistake of mine. In the current VM it now answers e.g. 1011.6 and so things should be working again.
>
Hi!
The problem is that the stable vm does not have the fix and the
current latest vm is **reeeeeeeeally* slow. It happens at least on
OSX. I don't know if it is a known problem or if it comes from the
opensmalltalk build or the pharo build.I found and fixed the problem just now. Seeopensmalltalk-vm/Cogcommit f54456fc05c1846bb7e553c6ff5fec9f700abdae Author: Eliot Miranda <eliot.miranda@gmail.com>Date: Wed Jun 21 11:17:25 2017 -0700CogVM source as per VMMaker.oscog-eem.2244Spur: Fix regression in VMMaker.oscog-eem.2237. sufficientSpaceAfterGC: mustcompute heapSizePostGC using totalOldSpaceCapacity instead of the old brokensegment-insensitive endOfMemory - nilObj, otherwise as soon as a segment isadded it's quite possible that there will be a full GC after each scavenge.So the latest VMs should be back to normal.yes that should.I just need to promote them as “stable” :P
EstebanI got the VM here: http://files.pharo.org/vm/pharo-spur32/mac/
--
Cyril Ferlicot
https://ferlicot.fr
http://www.synectique.eu
2 rue Jacques Prévert 01,
59650 Villeneuve d'ascq France
--_,,,^..^,,,_best, Eliot