On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 11:09 PM, Esteban Lorenzano <estebanlm@gmail.com> wrote:
 

On 21 Jun 2017, at 23:07, Eliot Miranda <eliot.miranda@gmail.com> wrote:

Hi Cyril, Hi Alex,

On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 8:08 AM, Cyril Ferlicot <cyril.ferlicot@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 5:04 PM, Eliot Miranda <eliot.miranda@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Clément
>
>
> That was a mistake of mine.  In the current VM it now answers e.g. 1011.6 and so things should be working again.
>

Hi!

The problem is that the stable vm does not have the fix and the
current latest vm is **reeeeeeeeally* slow. It happens at least on
OSX. I don't know if it is a known problem or if it comes from the
opensmalltalk build or the pharo build.

I found and fixed the problem just now. See

opensmalltalk-vm/Cog
commit f54456fc05c1846bb7e553c6ff5fec9f700abdae

Author: Eliot Miranda <eliot.miranda@gmail.com>
Date:   Wed Jun 21 11:17:25 2017 -0700

    CogVM source as per VMMaker.oscog-eem.2244

    Spur: Fix regression in VMMaker.oscog-eem.2237.  sufficientSpaceAfterGC: must
    compute heapSizePostGC using totalOldSpaceCapacity instead of the old broken
    segment-insensitive endOfMemory - nilObj, otherwise as soon as a segment is
    added it's quite possible that there will be a full GC after each scavenge.

So the latest VMs should be back to normal.

yes that should. 
I just need to promote them as “stable” :P

Does it also create a new release of Pharo 6 (same image, new VM) ? 

Esteban

 
I got the VM here: http://files.pharo.org/vm/pharo-spur32/mac/



--
Cyril Ferlicot
https://ferlicot.fr

http://www.synectique.eu
2 rue Jacques Prévert 01,
59650 Villeneuve d'ascq France




--
_,,,^..^,,,_
best, Eliot