On 19 June 2018 at 00:47, OpenSmalltalk-Bot <notifications@github.com>
wrote:

>
>
> > On 18-06-2018, at 8:14 AM, HonshuBloc <notifications@github.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hello
> > I´m a graphic designer looking for cool open source projects to make a
> graphic contribution, for free of course :P
>

Thanks for the offer.




> > δm wondering if you are interested in a new logo for your project.
>
> We've been happily using the current one for 22 years now, so probably
> not. Of course, I'm biased since I designed it.
>

Tim, I guess you referring to the Squeak logo (
http://www.rowledge.org/tim/squeak/files/page17_1.jpg) which is well
established.
But I don't think we've long had the OpenSmalltalk "Cog" logo (
http://opensmalltalk.org/static/img/cog.png/).
While its workable, its but a bit "complicated" for a logo.

Now that we have Spur and Sista as technology components that extend Cog,
it might be good to base a logo on more generic concepts that distinguish
us:
1. message passing between objects
2. object-oriented execution engine

Are those reasonable? What other distinctions are important compared to
other systems, and how should they be prioritized for a logo?

cheers -ben


You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.