[Box-Admins] Missing reply-to header from hardware@lists.squeakfoundation.org

[Ken Causey]

Just leave it for Matthew please.  I think this should be up to each
list administrator.  Also I thought the other way was the default, but
no matter.

Ken

On Mon, 2007-06-11 at 22:10 +0200, Marcus Denker wrote:
> On 11.06.2007, at 20:15, Ken Causey wrote:
> 
> > I believe that's due to a configuration choice that Matthew made  
> > for the
> > mailing list.
> >
> 
> The standard for new lists is that they have no reply-to-list, but  
> this can be easily
> changes... I could do it, if needed/wanted.
> 
> 	Marcus
> 
> > Ken
> >
> > On Mon, 2007-06-11 at 19:16 +0200, Klaus D. Witzel wrote:
> >> Hi box admins,
> >>
> >> the recent posting from hardware at lists.squeakfoundation.org  
> >> arrived here
> >> without reply-to header (all other lists from  
> >> lists.squeakfoundation.org
> >> which I'm subscribed to seem to transmit that header).
> >>
> >> So when doing a reply, the original sender (the poster's email  
> >> address) is
> >> only available :(
> >>
> >> Thanx in advance.
> >>
> >> Cheers
> >> Klaus
> >>
> 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/box-admins/attachments/20070611/17fd3294/attachment.pgp