[Box-Admins] RE: [squeak-dev] testing - please ignore

[Cees de Groot]

Just checked, Gandi has executed zone xfer and is thus now also a NS for squeakfoundation.org

Best,

Cees

On 3 Jan, 2012, at 21:54 , Ken Causey wrote:

> Thanks
> 
> 217.70.177.40:allow,AXFR="squeakfoundation.org/squeak.org"
> 
> added to axfrdns configuration.
> 
> Ken
> 
> P.S. Just noticed that the way way old list address for the Box-Admins
> team was in the Cc.  I've corrected it in this message and someone needs
> to update their address book.
> 
>> -------- Original Message --------
>> Subject: Re: [squeak-dev] testing - please ignore
>> From: Cees de Groot <casedeg at gmail.com>
>> Date: Tue, January 03, 2012 2:02 pm
>> To: "Ken Causey" <ken at kencausey.com>
>> Cc: "Randal L. Schwartz" <merlyn at stonehenge.com>,
>> box-admins at discuss.squeakfoundation.org
>> 
>> 
>> I can provide secondary on a machine I run (at Inception hosting here in .EU), or Gandi can provide secondary/ternary. For that to work, ns6.gandi.net 217.70.177.40 needs to be allowed to do zone xfers. 
>> 
>> It's indeed not a big thing - with one machine comprising the whole infrastructure, it's hardly relevant if DNS still works when box2 is down :)
>> 
>> 
>> On 3 Jan, 2012, at 20:23 , Ken Causey wrote:
>> 
>>> Yes, b.ns was the old Box1 at byteservers (IIRC) and no longer exists. 
>>> We've managed to limp along OK with one for years now.  That said, if we
>>> can use gandi.net as a backup DNS and re-point b.ns at them, that would
>>> be great.  We will need to allow mirroring of the dns records of course.
>>> 
>>> Ken
>>> 
>>>> -------- Original Message --------
>>>> Subject: Re: [squeak-dev] testing - please ignore
>>>> From: Cees de Groot <casedeg at gmail.com>
>>>> Date: Tue, January 03, 2012 12:54 pm
>>>> To: "Randal L. Schwartz" <merlyn at stonehenge.com>, Ken Causey
>>>> <ken at kencausey.com>
>>>> Cc: box-admins at discuss.squeakfoundation.org
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Also added glue records for a.ns and b.ns, threw them into the zone file as well for good measure. I can probably safely swap NS back to the two official nameservers now. 
>>>> 
>>>> Is it correct that b.ns is not responding?
>>>> 
>>>> On 3 Jan, 2012, at 19:42 , Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> "Cees" == Cees de Groot <casedeg at gmail.com> writes:
>>>>> 
>>>>> Cees> Most important is MX, isn't it? Still same box as squeak.org?
>>>>> 
>>>>> Yeah, if we can get lists.squeakfoundation.org to point A and MX both at
>>>>> squeak.org, we'll be 90% of the way there.  That's what has everything
>>>>> shut down right now.
>>>>> 
>>>>> And maybe "discuss.", from the looks of these headers.  Same thing.
>>>>> 
>>>>> -- 
>>>>> Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095
>>>>> <merlyn at stonehenge.com> <URL:http://www.stonehenge.com/merlyn/>
>>>>> Smalltalk/Perl/Unix consulting, Technical writing, Comedy, etc. etc.
>>>>> See http://methodsandmessages.posterous.com/ for Smalltalk discussion
>>> 
>