[Box-Admins] Re: [squeak-dev] We need to move Squeak services for the new servers ASAP.

[Frank Shearar]

So has build.squeak.org just moved?

The last two SqueakTrunk builds
(http://build.squeak.org/job/SqueakTrunk/938/console) failed for a
reason that makes me think so:

[ScriptTrigger] Groovy Expression evaluation to true. (log)
Building on master in workspace /var/lib/jenkins/workspace/SqueakTrunk
Checkout:SqueakTrunk / /var/lib/jenkins/workspace/SqueakTrunk -
hudson.remoting.LocalChannel at 1ecf8f1
Using strategy: Default
Last Built Revision: Revision b82ad63863c9f15a98725718f932da1989108b2e
(origin/master)
Fetching changes from 1 remote Git repository
Fetching upstream changes from https://github.com/frankshearar/squeak-ci.git
Commencing build of Revision dd824583e285d499ad85d61d0aa5b513c74a7f1a
(origin/master)
Checking out Revision dd824583e285d499ad85d61d0aa5b513c74a7f1a (origin/master)
[SqueakTrunk] $ /bin/sh -xe /tmp/hudson7495073579043623759.sh
+ [ -d /var/lib/jenkins/.rvm ]
[SqueakTrunk] $ /bin/sh -xe /tmp/hudson8192119631470192420.sh
+ bundle install
ERROR: Gem bundler is not installed, run `gem install bundler` first.(B
Build step 'Execute shell' marked build as failure

That would happen if the build agent (build.squeak.org itself, in this
case) didn't have the bundle gem installed.

frank

On 3 October 2014 01:46, Levente Uzonyi <leves at elte.hu> wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Oct 2014, Chris Muller wrote:
>
>> (Moved to box-admins)
>>
>> And, I imagine the wiki and SqueakMap can be moved relatively easily.
>> I am planning to look at those as soon as I can.
>>
>> That leaves the email lists and..?
>
>
> Mantis, the complete mailing system, the mailing lists, and the DNS servers.
> IIRC the DNS servers are already installed (not sure if they are configured
> or not) on the new boxes (IIRC by Tobias), but for some reason the name
> servers for the squeak.org domain are defined as a.ns.squeakfoundation.org,
> and b.ns.squeakfoundation.org.
> This means that if we want to use the new boxes as nameservers, then these
> records have to be updated, but that can only be done my the owner of
> squeakfoundation.org (Cees de Groot).
> IIRC Ken tried to achieve that for a long time without success.
> Another way to solve this - and I think it would be a better solution - is
> to move these NS records to the squeak.org domain itself, but that can only
> be done by the owner of the squeak.org domain (Daniel H. H. Ingalls, Jr.).
>
> Since box2 is the main DNS server, it has to stay up till the NS records are
> updated.
>
>
> Levente
>
>
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 6:39 PM, David T. Lewis <lewis at mail.msen.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed, Oct 01, 2014 at 04:25:48PM -0700, tim Rowledge wrote:
>>>>
>>>> For a long time we?ve had free servers available via the SFC that we
>>>> should be using instead of the Hetzner boxes that cost us (or more
>>>> accurately, SFC) money. Every now and then we make a little progress
>>>> in migrating but we really need to make a push on doing this *soon*.
>>>> Effectively we?re spending other people?s money when we don't? need to.
>>>> And we don?t even have a ?donate? button on our website right now...
>>>>
>>>> Levente is the official box-team leader so it?s up to him exactly how
>>>> it gets done but I?d be really surprised if he couldn?t do with
>>>> assistance
>>>> from one or more people with some sysadmin chops. Please, volunteer if
>>>> you have serious box-fu.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Chris Muller and I were talking about volunteering to handle the
>>> migration
>>> of source.squeak.org, so I think that you can count on the two of us to
>>> take up that part of the project. Chris has a lot of experience with
>>> SqueakSource, and I handled the migration of squeaksource.com onto our
>>> servers last year, so I think that between the two of us we can get
>>> source.squeak.org moved. We will make sure that anything we do has
>>> Levente's
>>> support and approval.
>>>
>>> Dave
>>>
>>>
>>
>