[Cryptography Team] Test cases

Robert Withers reefedjib at yahoo.com
Thu Oct 5 13:40:12 UTC 2006


Ron,

It makes perfect sense to do so.   At least splitting the test cases  
up will mean we can focus on a specific set of test cases rather than  
pay the whole cost each time.  There are a set of test cases using  
Rijndael that are failing.  Any ideas on them?

cheers,
Robert

On Oct 5, 2006, at 6:13 AM, Ron Teitelbaum wrote:

> Rob,
>
> We need to add standard test to all cryptographic functions.  This  
> is one of
> those tests.  I would be ok with me if we have multiple test  
> classes.  We
> could have basic tests for us, and a separate set of standard  
> tests.  It
> would be ok with me to move this test to a standard test class.
>
> Ron
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: cryptography-bounces at lists.squeakfoundation.org
>> [mailto:cryptography-bounces at lists.squeakfoundation.org] On Behalf Of
>> Robert Withers
>> Sent: Wednesday, October 04, 2006 10:51 PM
>> To: Cryptography Team Development List
>> Subject: [Cryptography Team] Test cases
>>
>> I was thinking of splitting the Test Case up into multiple test cases
>> that can be run independently.  There are a few tests that take a
>> very long time, including the ElGamal test cases and one of the tests
>> for SHA256.  I was to create the following test cases:
>>
>> DSATestCase
>> RSATestCase
>> DESTestCase
>> HashFunctionTestCase
>> ElGamalTestCase
>> RijndaelTestCase
>> CipherBlockModeTestCase
>>
>>
>> Then ElGamal can take a long time.  Is it ok to remove the SHA256
>> test case of  hashing a 1000000 $a string?  The function is already
>> tested with the other two tests.
>>
>> Does anyone have an issue with my doing this?
>>
>> cheers,
>> Robert
>> _______________________________________________
>> Cryptography mailing list
>> Cryptography at lists.squeakfoundation.org
>> http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ 
>> cryptography
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Cryptography mailing list
> Cryptography at lists.squeakfoundation.org
> http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ 
> cryptography



More information about the Cryptography mailing list