[Cryptography Team] Test cases

[Robert Withers]

I just split the tests apart and made some changes to speed things up.

DiffieHellman:  now only generate a 64 bit prime/generator, otherwise  
test with a pre-generated prime/generator pair
ElGamal:  now only generate a 64 bit keys, otherwise test with a  
single 512 bit pre-generated keys
SHA256:  commented out the test of a string of 1000000 $a.   When  
primitive support arrives, we can uncomment.

All tests run in under 3 seconds of so, so there is good responsive  
feedback.

cheers,
Robert

On Oct 5, 2006, at 7:22 AM, Robert Withers wrote:

> Load the latest Cryptography-Tests
>
> On Oct 5, 2006, at 6:40 AM, Robert Withers wrote:
>
>> Ron,
>>
>> It makes perfect sense to do so.   At least splitting the test  
>> cases up will mean we can focus on a specific set of test cases  
>> rather than pay the whole cost each time.  There are a set of test  
>> cases using Rijndael that are failing.  Any ideas on them?
>>
>> cheers,
>> Robert
>>
>> On Oct 5, 2006, at 6:13 AM, Ron Teitelbaum wrote:
>>
>>> Rob,
>>>
>>> We need to add standard test to all cryptographic functions.   
>>> This is one of
>>> those tests.  I would be ok with me if we have multiple test  
>>> classes.  We
>>> could have basic tests for us, and a separate set of standard  
>>> tests.  It
>>> would be ok with me to move this test to a standard test class.
>>>
>>> Ron
>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: cryptography-bounces at lists.squeakfoundation.org
>>>> [mailto:cryptography-bounces at lists.squeakfoundation.org] On  
>>>> Behalf Of
>>>> Robert Withers
>>>> Sent: Wednesday, October 04, 2006 10:51 PM
>>>> To: Cryptography Team Development List
>>>> Subject: [Cryptography Team] Test cases
>>>>
>>>> I was thinking of splitting the Test Case up into multiple test  
>>>> cases
>>>> that can be run independently.  There are a few tests that take a
>>>> very long time, including the ElGamal test cases and one of the  
>>>> tests
>>>> for SHA256.  I was to create the following test cases:
>>>>
>>>> DSATestCase
>>>> RSATestCase
>>>> DESTestCase
>>>> HashFunctionTestCase
>>>> ElGamalTestCase
>>>> RijndaelTestCase
>>>> CipherBlockModeTestCase
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Then ElGamal can take a long time.  Is it ok to remove the SHA256
>>>> test case of  hashing a 1000000 $a string?  The function is already
>>>> tested with the other two tests.
>>>>
>>>> Does anyone have an issue with my doing this?
>>>>
>>>> cheers,
>>>> Robert
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Cryptography mailing list
>>>> Cryptography at lists.squeakfoundation.org
>>>> http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ 
>>>> cryptography
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Cryptography mailing list
>>> Cryptography at lists.squeakfoundation.org
>>> http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ 
>>> cryptography
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Cryptography mailing list
>> Cryptography at lists.squeakfoundation.org
>> http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ 
>> cryptography
>
> _______________________________________________
> Cryptography mailing list
> Cryptography at lists.squeakfoundation.org
> http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ 
> cryptography