Asm-Generator - integration with Compiler

[Klaus D. Witzel]

On Mon, 23 Jul 2007 11:11:51 +0200, Igor Stasenko wrote:
> On 22/07/07, J J <azreal1977 at hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> ________________________________
>> > Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2007 08:57:08 +0300
>> > From: siguctua at gmail.com
>> > To: exupery at lists.squeakfoundation.org
>> > Subject: Asm-Generator - integration with Compiler
>> >
>> > To indicate that currently submitted method is assembler, developer
>> > just need to put
>> > <assembler> pragma in code.
>> > I will place some 'awful hacks' in Compiler to react on this pragma
>> > and redirect all further processing to my classes.
>>
>> Alternatively, you can just add a class side method (#compilerClass I  
>> think
>> it is) that tells Smalltalk to use what ever class you want when it  
>> tries to
>> compile methods for the class.  This might be better "self documenting"  
>> for
>> people reading the code that aren't familiar with what <assembler> might
>> mean and wouldn't know where too look.  But if they see compilerClass  
>> then
>> they know exactly what class to look at to see what's going on.
>>
>
> Its already done as you said :) I have a trait with couple of methods,
> which , when you use it in your class, then all instance side methods
> can be potentially treated as assembler.

Ahh, putting software composition at work :) can't wait for seeing this in  
action :)

>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Exupery mailing list
>> Exupery at lists.squeakfoundation.org
>> http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/exupery
>>
>>
>
>