Upgrade scripts?

[Bert Freudenberg]

Hmm? Monticello-bf.277 is a direct child of your Monticello- 
stephaneducasse.276 version which *is* in 3.9a, only two methods  
related to scripts changed.

- Bert -

Am 26.10.2005 um 15:12 schrieb stéphane ducasse:

> I wanted to push MC277 into the squeakfoundation 3.9a repository  
> but I saw that it was based on Integrated PlusTools.zip (Mantis  
> #1915).
> So is it safe for me to conclude that I should integrate all the  
> PlusTools changes before the fix of bert in MC?
>
> Stef
>
>
>>>>     http://source.impara.de/Stuff/Graphics-bf.24.mcz
>>>> you'll get an Abort notice when loading Graphics-bf.24 in an  
>>>> unsafe  image:
>>>>     (BitBlt canUnderstand: #displayString:from:to:at:kern:font:)
>>>>         ifFalse: [Abort new signal: 'need to load Graphics-ar. 
>>>> 21  first!']
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> This looks good. Can I rely on this behavior in the future? I  
>>> don't know if what you say about packageinfo having scripts  
>>> relates to or invalidates the above. I'd be perfectly happy with  
>>> the above solution.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Well, the script is executed if you have that fixed Monticello  
>> version, or PackageInfo with script support. Republishing the  
>> package will retain the script only if you have the right  
>> PackageInfo.
>>
>> Unless we decide to remove script support from MC this should  
>> continue to work.
>>
>> - Bert -
>>
>>
>