[Seaside-dev] Re: WAContext Refactoring

Randal L. Schwartz merlyn at stonehenge.com
Sat Mar 29 23:23:47 UTC 2008


>>>>> "Lukas" == Lukas Renggli <renggli at gmail.com> writes:

Lukas> But a process is also an object, isn't it? Philippe and I had a look
Lukas> at the GemStone code and thought that it should be feasible somehow to
Lukas> attach additional state to a Smalltalk process. This state doesn't
Lukas> have to persist, it just lives as long as a request is handled.

So you could use a WeakDictionary mapping a process to its properties, and
hide that behind a #properties method?  Can GemStone handle that?

In fact, it could be implemented that way in all versions, then you wouldn't
need a special GemStone version.

-- 
Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095
<merlyn at stonehenge.com> <URL:http://www.stonehenge.com/merlyn/>
Perl/Unix/security consulting, Technical writing, Comedy, etc. etc.
See PerlTraining.Stonehenge.com for onsite and open-enrollment Perl training!


More information about the seaside-dev mailing list