[Seaside-dev] RE: [Seaside] hot to use response during action phase?

Sebastian Sastre ssastre at seaswork.com
Mon Mar 9 15:03:28 UTC 2009


and just to make Lukas feel some extra pressure :) please Lukas, otherwise I'll
have to make an unelegant workaround to get this done ;)
thanks,
sebastian


> -----Mensaje original-----
> De: seaside-dev-bounces at lists.squeakfoundation.org 
> [mailto:seaside-dev-bounces at lists.squeakfoundation.org] En 
> nombre de Julian Fitzell
> Enviado el: Monday, March 09, 2009 11:56
> Para: Seaside - developer list
> Asunto: Re: [Seaside-dev] RE: [Seaside] hot to use response 
> during action phase?
> 
> Ah, I don't think the changes to allow cookies in the callback phase
> were done in time for a2. This issues was closed Jan 22:
> http://code.google.com/p/seaside/issues/detail?id=48 . I think a2 was
> released in Dec.
> 
> We've been meaning to do an a3 for a few weeks now. Lukas, can we
> temporarily revert that updateUrl: change and release an a3? I'd could
> do it myself but I don't know how; perhaps you could document all the
> steps when you do it this time so someone else can fill in in the
> future? (unless you want to keep doing them eternally, of course :) ).
> 
> Julian
> 
> On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 3:10 PM, Sebastian Sastre 
> <ssastre at seaswork.com> wrote:
> > you dont hit the halt?! wtf..
> > this is a pharo 243 image with all the updates and seaside 
> 2.9a2 loaded using
> > the attachment
> > (I tried to upgrade with Lukas instructions but I get stuck 
> at some point
> > (unresponsive UI).
> > what can I do? if I have to migrate to another image which 
> one would work?
> > thanks
> > sebastian
> >
> >> -----Mensaje original-----
> >> De: seaside-dev-bounces at lists.squeakfoundation.org
> >> [mailto:seaside-dev-bounces at lists.squeakfoundation.org] En
> >> nombre de Julian Fitzell
> >> Enviado el: Monday, March 09, 2009 11:06
> >> Para: Seaside - developer list
> >> Asunto: Re: [Seaside-dev] RE: [Seaside] hot to use response
> >> during action phase?
> >>
> >> Hm... I don't hit that halt so I don't seem to be able to 
> reproduce. I
> >> far as I can tell by looking, your code looks fine. In fact, if I
> >> change your #addCookie method as follows then I actually 
> get a cookie
> >> added:
> >>
> >> addCookie
> >>       "If response is nil here, I can't cookie :('"
> >>       self requestContext response addCookie:
> >>               (self requestContext newCookie
> >>                       key: 'foo';
> >>                       value: 'bar';
> >>                       yourself)
> >>
> >> How old is the Seaside code you are using?
> >>
> >> (by the way, you can just call "self requestContext"; you 
> don't need
> >> "self session requestContext")
> >>
> >> Julian
> >>
> >> On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 1:41 PM, Sebastian Sastre
> >> <ssastre at seaswork.com> wrote:
> >> > Hi Julian, I'm sending you a demo with the problem
> >> > best,
> >> > sebastian
> >> >
> >> >> -----Mensaje original-----
> >> >> De: seaside-dev-bounces at lists.squeakfoundation.org
> >> >> [mailto:seaside-dev-bounces at lists.squeakfoundation.org] En
> >> >> nombre de Julian Fitzell
> >> >> Enviado el: Sunday, March 08, 2009 06:23
> >> >> Para: Seaside - developer list
> >> >> Asunto: Re: [Seaside-dev] RE: [Seaside] hot to use response
> >> >> during action phase?
> >> >>
> >> >> Can you show the code that is calling this method?
> >> >>
> >> >> On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 5:18 PM, Sebastian Sastre
> >> >> <ssastre at seaswork.com> wrote:
> >> >> > hi Julian,
> >> >> > you're right, dev is better for this.
> >> >> > Look, in a WASession subclass I have this piece of code:
> >> >> >
> >> >> >  self requestContext response
> >> >> >                        addCookie: (WACookie new
> >> >> >                                                key: self
> >> >> loginRememberKey;
> >> >> >                                                value:
> >> >> loginCookieValue;
> >> >> >                                                yourself)
> >> >> >
> >> >> > and I can see the request context is called from the
> >> >> process variable and it is
> >> >> > not nil but its response instVar is nil and I found that's
> >> >> inconvenient
> >> >> > cheers,
> >> >> > seaside
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> -----Mensaje original-----
> >> >> >> De: seaside-bounces at lists.squeakfoundation.org
> >> >> >> [mailto:seaside-bounces at lists.squeakfoundation.org] En nombre
> >> >> >> de Julian Fitzell
> >> >> >> Enviado el: Saturday, March 07, 2009 12:51
> >> >> >> Para: Seaside - general discussion
> >> >> >> Asunto: Re: [Seaside] hot to use response during 
> action phase?
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> How are you calling #response on WASession? it should be self
> >> >> >> requestContext response addCookie:
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Are you storing the request context somewhere? That would
> >> >> be the most
> >> >> >> likely cause of the response being nil. You need to make
> >> >> sure to call
> >> >> >> "self requestContext" at the point that you want to use to
> >> >> make sure
> >> >> >> you are using the correct current context...
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Julian
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 4:33 PM, Sebastian Sastre
> >> >> >> <ssastre at seaswork.com> wrote:
> >> >> >> > Hi Lukas, yes I've read that in the seaside site and code
> >> >> >> so I was counting with
> >> >> >> > that and I find it cool. So I made my code to be using it
> >> >> >> like that. The problem
> >> >> >> > comes because the request context returns nil when
> >> >> >> #response is sent at that
> >> >> >> > point.
> >> >> >> > In the walkback I can see this is happening during the
> >> >> >> action phase continuation
> >> >> >> > evaluation, then reach my component, it announces something
> >> >> >> other reacts and
> >> >> >> > asks:
> >> >> >> > self session response addCookie: self newLoginCookie
> >> >> >> > and then I have a nil DNU #addCookie:
> >> >> >> > there could be a problem on *when* the response inst var is
> >> >> >> initialized in the
> >> >> >> > request context? why the response is not initialized right
> >> >> >> from the begining
> >> >> >> > (request context fabrication)?
> >> >> >> > thanks
> >> >> >> > sebastian
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> -----Mensaje original-----
> >> >> >> >> De: seaside-bounces at lists.squeakfoundation.org
> >> >> >> >> 
> [mailto:seaside-bounces at lists.squeakfoundation.org] En nombre
> >> >> >> >> de Lukas Renggli
> >> >> >> >> Enviado el: Saturday, March 07, 2009 05:56
> >> >> >> >> Para: Seaside - general discussion
> >> >> >> >> Asunto: Re: [Seaside] hot to use response during
> >> action phase?
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> > I need to manipulate a couple cookies from the 
> app and when
> >> >> >> >> porting from 2.8 to
> >> >> >> >> > 2.9 I've noticed the action phase has not available the
> >> >> >> >> response in the request
> >> >> >> >> > context.
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> In Seaside 2.9 every request is processed with a
> >> request context
> >> >> >> >> (instance of WARequestContext). The request context is
> >> >> >> instantiated by
> >> >> >> >> the sever adaptor and knows all the necessary things to
> >> >> process a
> >> >> >> >> request. It holds the request (instance of WARequest) and
> >> >> >> the response
> >> >> >> >> (instance of WAResponse). Furthermore, it also knows
> >> the current
> >> >> >> >> application and session if available.
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> So adding cookies is much easier in Seaside 2.9. There is
> >> >> >> no need to
> >> >> >> >> do a redirect anymore, because the response that is sent
> >> >> >> back to the
> >> >> >> >> browser is known upfront. Simply ask the request
> >> context for the
> >> >> >> >> current response and add your cookies in the callback or
> >> >> >> render phase:
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >>     self requestContext response addCookie: ...
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> Cheers,
> >> >> >> >> Lukas
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> --
> >> >> >> >> Lukas Renggli
> >> >> >> >> http://www.lukas-renggli.ch
> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________
> >> >> >> >> seaside mailing list
> >> >> >> >> seaside at lists.squeakfoundation.org
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> 
> http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> >> >> > seaside mailing list
> >> >> >> > seaside at lists.squeakfoundation.org
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> 
> http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> _______________________________________________
> >> >> >> seaside mailing list
> >> >> >> seaside at lists.squeakfoundation.org
> >> >> >>
> >> http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside
> >> >> >
> >> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> >> > seaside-dev mailing list
> >> >> > seaside-dev at lists.squeakfoundation.org
> >> >> > http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/seaside-dev
> >> >> >
> >> >> _______________________________________________
> >> >> seaside-dev mailing list
> >> >> seaside-dev at lists.squeakfoundation.org
> >> >> http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/seaside-dev
> >> >
> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> > seaside-dev mailing list
> >> > seaside-dev at lists.squeakfoundation.org
> >> > http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/seaside-dev
> >> >
> >> >
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> seaside-dev mailing list
> >> seaside-dev at lists.squeakfoundation.org
> >> http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/seaside-dev
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > seaside-dev mailing list
> > seaside-dev at lists.squeakfoundation.org
> > http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/seaside-dev
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> seaside-dev mailing list
> seaside-dev at lists.squeakfoundation.org
> http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/seaside-dev



More information about the seaside-dev mailing list