[Seaside-dev] Seaside 3.0 final and Pharo 1.0

Julian Fitzell jfitzell at gmail.com
Thu Oct 7 08:19:24 UTC 2010


Well, I personally have no issue with someone maintaining a Grease
platform package for Pharo1.0 so I'm reluctant to say it's not
supported. But I think this falls into the same camp as Squeak or any
other platform: we'll do whatever we can to support people who want to
maintain support on other platforms but the core team is focusing on
just one (currently, the current stable version of Pharo).

I haven't discussed with any of the other developers, though, so it
may be just my opinion.

Julian

On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 1:52 AM, Dale Henrichs <dhenrich at vmware.com> wrote:
> On 10/05/2010 01:47 PM, Dale Henrichs wrote:
>>
>> I am building the configuration for the 3.0 final release and I'm
>> getting a bunch of test failures in Pharo1.0:
>>
>>    1652 run, 1609 passes, 2 expected failures, 0 failures, 41 errors,
>>      0 unexpected passes
>>
>> It looks like the errors are due to the removal of Collection>>#sorted,
>> Collection>>#sorted: and WriteStream class>>crlf... from
>> Grease-Pharo-Core ...
>>
>> So I'm just wondering if it is intentional to _not_ support Seaside3.0
>> on Pharo1.0.
>>
>> There are similar problems with earlier versions of Pharo 1.1
>> (Pharo-1.1-11411dev10.07.1 for example), but presumably the errors could
>> be fixed by updating to the latest ...
>>
>> It would be relatively straightforward to fix the problem at the cost of
>> an extra package for Pharo 1.0 (and earlier development versions of
>> Pharo1.1) if you are interested in making life easier for folks using
>> Seaside3.0 on those versions of Pharo.
>>
>>
>> Dale
>> _______________________________________________
>> seaside-dev mailing list
>> seaside-dev at lists.squeakfoundation.org
>> http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/seaside-dev
>
>
> Is there a definitive yes/no on the question of whether Seaside 3.0 is
> supported on Pharo 1.0?
>
> Like I said, I'm concerned about folks already deployed on Pharo 1.0, but
> maybe I shouldn't be. We're talking about 3 methods being the difference
> between running on Pharo1.0 and not...
>
> Pardon for asking but a definitive "Seaside 3.0 is not supported on Pharo
> 1.0" statement is what I am looking for ...
>
> Dale
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> seaside-dev mailing list
> seaside-dev at lists.squeakfoundation.org
> http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/seaside-dev
>


More information about the seaside-dev mailing list