[Seaside-dev] Peeking Unconsumed Path

Julian Fitzell jfitzell at gmail.com
Wed Oct 20 11:47:56 UTC 2010


If we're being pedantic and want it to read like natural language, the
verb peek doesn't take a direct object in English... you can peek at
something but you can't peek something. "remaining" is probably better
than "rest" though since it's consistent with "next" (both
adjectives).

(btw, I don't really care... just idly passing the time in the airport)

Julian

On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 1:00 AM, Torsten Bergmann <astares at gmx.de> wrote:
> #peekRemaining?
>
> Bye
> T.
>
> --
> GMX DSL Doppel-Flat ab 19,99 &euro;/mtl.! Jetzt auch mit
> gratis Notebook-Flat! http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/dsl
> _______________________________________________
> seaside-dev mailing list
> seaside-dev at lists.squeakfoundation.org
> http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/seaside-dev
>


More information about the seaside-dev mailing list