[Seaside-dev] Seaside 3.0.7

[Dale Henrichs]

Haha! With the abstract class involved, I thought that maybe you were leveraging that "special behavior" ... always better to ask than make an assumption one way or the other:)

I'll get back to the 3.0.7 for GemStone tomorrow and I'll put in the #respondsTo: then...

Dale

----- Original Message -----
| From: "Nick Ager" <nick.ager at gmail.com>
| To: "Seaside - developer list" <seaside-dev at lists.squeakfoundation.org>
| Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2012 10:11:17 AM
| Subject: Re: [Seaside-dev] Seaside 3.0.7
| 
| 
| 
| 
| Hi Dale,
| 
| 
| Did you take a look at #canPerform: ... I assume you used
| #canPerform: because you wanted it's "special behavior"?
| 
| 
| I fear you credit me with more intelligence than I deserve;
| #canPerform: vs #respondsTo: no "special behaviour" is required - I
| simply want to test the existence of a selector.
| 
| 
| Cheers
| 
| 
| Nick
| _______________________________________________
| seaside-dev mailing list
| seaside-dev at lists.squeakfoundation.org
| http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/seaside-dev
|