[Seaside-dev] HTTP 302 vs 303

Tobias Pape Das.Linux at gmx.de
Mon Feb 17 17:04:16 UTC 2014


On 17.02.2014, at 17:26, Philippe Marschall <philippe.marschall at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi
> 
> I came upon this HN thread [1]. The linked article suggests we should
> use HTTP 303 instead of 302 (because we want a change from POST to
> GET).
> 
> [1] http://insanecoding.blogspot.ch/2014/02/http-308-incompetence-expected.html

But we have to make sure, the line is speaking HTTP1.1, right?
(see note in http://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2616/rfc2616-sec10.html#sec10.3.4)

Best
	-Tobias


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 1625 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
Url : http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/seaside-dev/attachments/20140217/4fa6c7a8/signature.pgp


More information about the seaside-dev mailing list