[Seaside] Need arguments to sell Seaside

[Ian Prince]

Alan Knight has just recently posted an entry "What's Good About  
Smalltalk". Worth a read in case you have missed it.

	http://www.cincomsmalltalk.com/userblogs/knight/blogView? 
showComments=true&entry=3254944787

Cheers,

Ian.

On 24 Feb 2004, at 21:49, Alain Fischer wrote:

> Hello all,
>
> At the begining of the next week, I will make a small presentation
> to try to sell Seaside and Squeak to my collegues and my bosses.
>
> Till now we are using WebObjects and for a lot of reason more the time
> is going less I am happy to work with this framework in Java.
>
> I am searching for good arguments to use Seaside.
>
> The arguments I see now are:
> - Developing with smalltalk is efficient by coding with living objects  
> (debugger, inspector, explorer).
> - In most of the case an application in production could be fixed,  
> ehanced without redeploying and restarting.
> - There is multiple solution for persitance (GOODS, Roe, others for  
> production ?).
> - Seaside is nice:
>   - to reverse request response with the use of continuation,
>   - with the handling of back button in browser,
>   - the the return value of components.
>
> Any other idea is more than welcome.
>
> Alain
--
ian prince - inextenso - 1 ruelle des moulins - 1260 nyon - switzerland