[Seaside] GOODS design question

[Brian Murphy-Dye]

It actually segfaulted. I'll try your suggestions within the next 
couple of nights. And again, thanks for your help.


On Jun 16, 2004, at 4:13 PM, Avi Bryant wrote:

>
> On Jun 16, 2004, at 3:04 PM, Brian Murphy-Dye wrote:
>
>> Avi, this helps a lot and sounds pretty exciting! GOODS handling all 
>> of the referential integrity junk is definitely nice. Given your 
>> example, I would first need to
>>
>>      (db root at: 'studentByName') put: Dictionary new
>>
>> right? (Or perhaps 'BTree new'.)
>
> Yup.
>
>> I currently have a tangled web of 20,000 objects which I had tried to 
>> store in a GOODS database a few nights ago and it crashed the db. Do 
>> I need to add and commit a few objects at a time and slowly build up 
>> to the full 20,000 objects?
>
> That would be wise, yes.  What do you mean by "crashed the db"?  The 
> goodsrv process segfaulted?  If so, what version of GOODS are you 
> using and what version of gcc did you compile it with?  If not, it may 
> have just been very slow... at any rate, you definitely want to be 
> committing in smaller batches than that (commit a few hundred objects, 
> #flush or disconnect/reconnect, then keep going).
>
>>  Or perhaps GOODS doesn't handle SortedCollections?
>
> Well, it might manage to store them, but it will definitely have 
> difficulty retrieving them if they have sort blocks.  Use some other 
> object that responds to #value:value:.
>
> Avi
>
> _______________________________________________
> Seaside mailing list
> Seaside at lists.squeakfoundation.org
> http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/listinfo/seaside
>