[Seaside] Re: Re: Swazoo as reverse proxy?

[itsme213]

"Boris Popov" <boris at deepcovelabs.com> wrote

> Well, for internal deployments of this small scale that don't need ssl and 
> other advanced features Swazoo, Kom and others are already good enough, 
> isn't it?
>

Dunno. e.g. Does Swazoo server static content? I don't think Kom does. Not 
sure what other "features" make or don't make sense, and I do understand the 
points about not re-inventing Apache.

Unsure ... Sophie