[Seaside] Can you save CTPusher instances?

[Richard Durr]

So just don't render the Pusher if the user shouldn't be part of the
group that uses one. ^^

On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 7:51 PM, Robert Sirois <watchlala at hotmail.com> wrote:
> Oh heck no. What I was hoping to do was have a bunch of different components
> that just a few users could be a part of as far as pusher handlers go.
>
> RS
>
>> Date: Sat, 15 May 2010 19:48:03 +0200
>> Subject: Re: [Seaside] Can you save CTPusher instances?
>> From: richard.durr at googlemail.com
>> To: seaside at lists.squeakfoundation.org
>>
>> I do not understand: Isn't this the default-way?
>>
>> RD
>>
>> On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 7:37 PM, Robert Sirois <watchlala at hotmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > I was wondering if you could hold an instance of CTPusher on the
>> > instance
>> > side of a WAComponent and then only the clients that render that
>> > WAComponent
>> > will be pushed the js from that pusher? Or am I just trying to make
>> > something work that can't...
>> >
>> > RS
>> >
>> > ________________________________
>> > The New Busy think 9 to 5 is a cute idea. Combine multiple calendars
>> > with
>> > Hotmail. Get busy.
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > seaside mailing list
>> > seaside at lists.squeakfoundation.org
>> > http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside
>> >
>> >
>> _______________________________________________
>> seaside mailing list
>> seaside at lists.squeakfoundation.org
>> http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside
>
> ________________________________
> The New Busy is not the old busy. Search, chat and e-mail from your inbox.
> Get started.
> _______________________________________________
> seaside mailing list
> seaside at lists.squeakfoundation.org
> http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside
>
>