[Seaside] Re: Session expiration and data cleaning
Bob Arning
arning315 at comcast.net
Wed Feb 26 19:34:57 UTC 2014
You might try
PointerFinder on: WASession allInstances first
Cheers,
Bob
On 2/26/14 2:09 PM, Jon Paynter wrote:
> ive tried WASession allInstances do: [ : item | item unregister].
> and various other permutations.
>
> Some sessions go away, but most do not. So something else is hanging
> onto the sessions. Eventually I will get fed up with my bloated image
> and reload everything from source.
>
> If there is a reasonable way to track what is holding onto the
> sessions i can track that down and either fix my own bugs, or submit a
> new one here to the list.
>
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 10:00 AM, Bob Arning <arning315 at comcast.net
> <mailto:arning315 at comcast.net>> wrote:
>
> Umm, my reply was to Jon Paynter's message which was basically how
> to clean up during development. Whether someone finds some
> applicability to post-development scenarios, well, YMMV.
>
> Cheers,
> Bob
>
>
> On 2/26/14 12:48 PM, Philippe Marschall wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 7:19 PM, Bob Arning<arning315 at comcast.net> <mailto:arning315 at comcast.net> wrote:
>>> I wonder if this doesn't point the way...
>>>
>>> expire
>>> self
>>> greaseDeprecatedApi: 'WASession>>#expire'
>>> details: 'This method might be reimplemented again. In the meantime,
>>> if you just want to remove the Session from the Application, use
>>> WASession>>unregister (#unregistered will be called as a notification
>>> instead of #expired). Otherwise you should consider adding a Request Filter
>>> to the Session that implements whatever behaviour you want in order to block
>>> access to the Session.'.
>>> ^ self unregister
>>>
>>> as well as...
>>>
>>> WACache allInstances do: [ :e | e reap].
>> What problem exactly are you trying to solve? Do you have to do some
>> work when the session expires?
>>
>> It is true that per default we only expire on every n-th session
>> creation. You can change this by swapping the reapingStrategy
>> WAAccessIntervalReapingStrategy. However keep in mind that:
>> - if somebody just creates sessions but never accesses them you may
>> still want to reap at some point
>> - reaping does not scale well, you have to walk over all the sessions
>>
>> We are aware that the current situation is suboptimal and are working
>> on a replacement [1] but that may take a moment.
>>
>> [1]http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/seaside-dev/2014-February/005710.html
>>
>> Cheers
>> Philippe
>> _______________________________________________
>> seaside mailing list
>> seaside at lists.squeakfoundation.org <mailto:seaside at lists.squeakfoundation.org>
>> http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> seaside mailing list
> seaside at lists.squeakfoundation.org
> <mailto:seaside at lists.squeakfoundation.org>
> http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> seaside mailing list
> seaside at lists.squeakfoundation.org
> http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/seaside/attachments/20140226/7516d807/attachment.htm
More information about the seaside
mailing list