[Setools] What we have yet

Klaus D. Witzel klaus.witzel at cobss.com
Mon Jun 26 03:35:49 UTC 2006


Hi Hans,

on Sun, 25 Jun 2006 22:31:48 +0200, you wrote:
> Hi Klaus,
> Am 25.06.2006 um 22:26 schrieb Klaus D. Witzel:
>> Hi Alex,
>> on Sun, 25 Jun 2006 16:45:11 +0200, you wrote:
>>> Hi Klaus!
>> Thank you Alex for redirecting my post :)
>>
>>>> I'm interested in better (not necessarily faster) prototyping, in the  
>>>> sense of drafting new or refining existing software at the draft  
>>>> level, with full support of a running+reflexive system (and of DNU,  
>>>> of course :)
>>>
>>> Do you have an idea of what is currently missing in Squeak ?
>>
>> Sure. But I have to picture it, or else too many words will blur it. A  
>> starting points is, and my colleague in UBS agrees fully, a rewarding  
>> system for re-use. Simply that. We know that we cannot penalize  
>> non-reuse, don't we. What are the tools which tell me: don't go any  
>> further Klaus, *this here* is already available for you to reuse. How  
>> shall I ask, how formulate a query. Google is of no help here, so we  
>> must invent.
>
> ..... ? Means what ? Unfortunatly, I'm not really understand what you  
> are talking about......

This has perhaps to do with what I wrote, " ... have [as yet] no picture,  
too many word won't make it better [understandable] ... "?

> Can you say a little bit more ?

Sure. You ask a specific question, I promise to do my best answering it.

/Klaus



More information about the Setools mailing list