Does Squeak include a generic node class?
Jerome.Garcia at wj.com
Thu Oct 22 17:51:28 UTC 1998
Although I must classify myself as a Squeak newbie, I do feel that
that this would be the correct approach since Behavior appears to be
just a specialized kind of node.
Jerome E. Garcia
jegarcia at adventurousmind.com
______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: Re: Does Squeak include a generic node class?
Author: Craig Latta <Craig.Latta at NetJam.ORG> at INTERNET
Date: 10/17/98 10:36 AM
John Maloney writes:
> It doesn't have one, but it's so easy to write one that it doesn't
> seem necessary to include one in the image.
Hmm, perhaps Behavior should be a subclass of Node? :)
composer and computer scientist
craig.latta at netjam.org
latta at interval.com
Smalltalkers do: [:it | All with: Class, (And love: it)]
More information about the Squeak-dev