>
>
> "Michael S. Klein" wrote:
> >
> > Another posibility for printing would be to port Squeak to a printer
> > platform.  They are already supporting Postscript VM's. This seems
> > to be a squeaky-clean way to get a portable imaging model.
>
> Go ahead and persuade HP to do that...
>

On the other hand, a squeaky front end to ghostscript'd do the job nicely,
I'd think.

-rj