New Squeak Porting Proposals
Alan.Kay at disney.com
Tue Aug 17 20:22:13 UTC 1999
This is roughly what the itsy folks at DEC/COMPAQ do ... The Squeak that
runs on it uses this convention.
It works fairly well.
At 11:06 AM -0800 8/17/99, Bob Arning wrote:
>On Tue, 17 Aug 1999 11:08:00 -0700 "Raab, Andreas"
><Andreas.Raab at disney.com> wrote:
>>> The stylus interface works, as you've implemented it. It's just not
>>> usable. Because WinCE doesn't show the mouse cursor, and there is
>>> only one button with now Cmd or Option keys, a lot of the Squeak interface
>>> inaccessible (especially in Morphic).
>>Do you have any idea how that could be fixed except from writing a complete
>>new UI for stylus based computers?!
>Hmmm... What if the VM (or prehaps it could be done in Squeak) treated a
>stylus touching the screen and moving as simply a mouseMove and relied on
>an additional keypress to consider the touch as a mouseDown. One could
>also consider the software Apple developed for limited-access situations:
>repeatedly hitting the shift-key toggled a state thingie between various
>metakey combinations that were applied to normal keystrokes.
More information about the Squeak-dev