FW: Pressures for Substantially New Squeaks
Peter.Crowther at it-iq.com
Thu Feb 18 12:48:23 UTC 1999
This also got eaten.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Peter Crowther
> Sent: Monday, February 15, 1999 12:49 PM
> To: 'squeak at cs.uiuc.edu'
> Subject: RE: Pressures for Substantially New Squeaks
> Squeak also has such a convention. Put private modules in a protocol
> category entitled "private." If you really desperately need to have
> the compiler remind you of impinging upon private modules -- go ahead
> and have the compiler do that for you.
> I have a requirement for enforced private (and protected) methods, and am
> in the process of adding tweeks to the VM to catch calls made to them by
> *any* means, including perform: and the Debugger simulations. Watch this
> space... --> <--.
> - Peter
More information about the Squeak-dev