FW: Pressures for Substantially New Squeaks

Peter Crowther Peter.Crowther at it-iq.com
Thu Feb 18 12:48:23 UTC 1999

This also got eaten.

		- Peter

> -----Original Message-----
> From:	Peter Crowther 
> Sent:	Monday, February 15, 1999 12:49 PM
> To:	'squeak at cs.uiuc.edu'
> Subject:	RE: Pressures for Substantially New Squeaks
> Squeak also has such a convention.  Put private modules in a protocol 
> category entitled "private."  If you really desperately need to have 
> the compiler remind you of impinging upon private modules -- go ahead 
> and have the compiler do that for you.
> I have a requirement for enforced private (and protected) methods, and am
> in the process of adding tweeks to the VM to catch calls made to them by
> *any* means, including perform: and the Debugger simulations.  Watch this
> space... --> <--.
> 		- Peter

More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list