Squeak already has private method support (was Re: FW: Pressu

Tim Rowledge rowledge at interval.com
Mon Feb 22 05:44:36 UTC 1999

On Sun 21 Feb, Ivan Tomek wrote:

> Isn't optional runtime checking a possibility?
Well, in the sense of there being the option to not write the code to do
it, sure :-)  Any attempt at having a runtime switch would probably cost as
uch as always havingthe check - since you would have to check the 'do I
check for private' flag...


Useful random insult:- A vacuum-tube brain in a microchip world.
Tim Rowledge:  rowledge at interval.com (w)  +1 (650) 842-6110 (w)
 tim at sumeru.stanford.edu (h)  <http://sumeru.stanford.edu/tim>

More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list