Squeak already has private method support (was Re: FW: Pressu
Tim Rowledge
rowledge at interval.com
Mon Feb 22 05:44:36 UTC 1999
On Sun 21 Feb, Ivan Tomek wrote:
>
> Isn't optional runtime checking a possibility?
Well, in the sense of there being the option to not write the code to do
it, sure :-) Any attempt at having a runtime switch would probably cost as
uch as always havingthe check - since you would have to check the 'do I
check for private' flag...
tim
--
Useful random insult:- A vacuum-tube brain in a microchip world.
Tim Rowledge: rowledge at interval.com (w) +1 (650) 842-6110 (w)
tim at sumeru.stanford.edu (h) <http://sumeru.stanford.edu/tim>
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|