How About an InstallSqueak Image?
Tim Rowledge
rowledge at interval.com
Wed Jun 16 05:22:17 UTC 1999
On Tue 15 Jun, agree at carltonfields.com wrote:
> I may be missing things here, but between a single (relatively tiny) executable VM fil
> e and a plurality of plugins and a slightly tinier executable VM, I prefer the former.
> Indeed, once we have the VM pluginized in this manner, we suddenly have to start wor
> rying about an installshield for the VM. Right now, you can download the VM with a pa
> inless and non-error-prone FTP. Likewise an image file.
Well, it seems a bunch of people are having trouble with FTP, which is how
we got into this discusion!
If a zip file is built with all the VM/image plugins in a subdirectory, I
don't see how it complicates anything - just extract the lot into one place
and go. You'd end up with something like:-
SqueakDirectory
squeakVM
plugins
VM
network
serial
sound
balloon
balloon3D
etc
VI
network
serial
sound
balloon
morphic
debugging
basicUI
supportfiles
image
sources
changelog
d-click on squeakVM would startup with the basic image and do whatever (run
a script, startup the IDE etc). If you start a vanilla image, it ought to
tell you to save it under a personal name straight away.
--
Useful random insult:- A natural talent for finding subliminal messages in ice cubes.
Tim Rowledge: rowledge at interval.com (w) +1 (650) 842-6110 (w)
tim at sumeru.stanford.edu (h) <http://sumeru.stanford.edu/tim>
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|