I would like to second that "Thanks a bunch" and "Looks like a first 
     class piece of work...". 
     
     Just for fun, I have been trying to discover what would prevent 
     porting of ControlWORKS and our semiconductor processing equipment 
     software to Squeak from VisualWORKS (ignoring of course the sales job 
     of convincing management to do such a thing). It looks like you have 
     plugged one of the major holes. We use exceptions a lot. Now, if only 
     there was a tool to help automate the port in order to give it a quick 
     try :-)
     
     Jerome


______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: re: exception handling for Squeak available
Author:  "R. A. Harmon" <harmonra at webname.com> at INTERNET
Date:    3/3/99 2:31 PM


At 12:35 AM 3/3/99 -0800, you wrote: 
[snip]
>       I'll mark my exception handling framework 
(http://www.netjam.org/self/projects/smalltalk/exceptionHandling.html), as 
version one final on Monday, unless I hear about bugs before then. There 
have been 30 hits so far, but I haven't heard any feedback yet.
[snip]
     
Looks like a first class piece of work to me.  I'm in the process of trying 
to relate your instance-based approach to ANSI's class-based.
     
Very nicely done.  Thanks a bunch.
     
--
Richard A. Harmon          "The only good zombie is a dead zombie" 
harmonra at webname.com           E. G. McCarthy