>I believe Smalltalk currently has 3 types of messages:
>
>unary
>binary
>and keyword
>
>Correct?  How would you characterize []?

Yes.  Honestly, I've no idea.  It's just a bit of syntax in the same way as
":=" or "^" - and it's a macro for at: or even at:put:.  It's a shortcut.
It's... an extension :-)


bye
--
Stefan Matthias Aust  //  ...and now something completely different