On Wed, 17 Mar 1999, Joshua Marker wrote:

> 
> 	Errrrrrr. Isn't a read-only newsgroup about as useful as read-only
> memory?
> 
> 	I prefer it this way. Maybe we can have a tutorial on how to
> filter mail with procmail and other common mail packages. . . . 
> 

Like Celeste! ;)

More seriously, perhaps a Celeste archive of the mailing list is in order.
One could download it, or have it mailing (as a kind of digest).

I'm playing with this stuff right now. If I get anything interesting I'll
post it. But, let me just add that Celeste is pretty neat, so I'd
encourage people to dive in :)

Cheers,
Bijan Parsia