I don't know enough about MacOS to give you a definitive answer. I did spoke
with John about it and he's looking into it.

  Andreas
--
+===== Andreas Raab ========= (andreasr at wdi.disney.com) ==+
| Walt Disney Imagineering        Phone: +1 818 544 5016  I
I Glendale, CA                    Fax:   +1 818 544 4544  I
+======< http://isgwww.cs.uni-magdeburg.de/~raab >========+


> ----------
> From: 	Andrew C. Greenberg
> Reply To: 	squeak at cs.uiuc.edu
> Sent: 	Saturday, May 8, 1999 7:15 PM
> To: 	squeak at cs.uiuc.edu
> Cc: 	recipient list not shown
> Subject: 	RE: [Win32] VM Update
> 
> >Reinier,
> >
> >There is no difference in the display handling (in fact there is no
> >difference in running Squeak as a browser plugin or not ;-) There are two
> >factors that may affect display performance though - one being that
> Squeak
> >just runs in a tiny window (basically VGA 640x480) and naturally, if the
> >display region is smaller there is less work to do. The second one might
> be
> >that there is nothing on the screen - meaning that there is only one
> Window
> >(no projects, no other workspaces) and this might slightly affect drawing
> >speed (though I think this is relatively unlikely). Actually, the biggest
> >difference I felt was that of image startup which is definitely due to
> >having the image shrunken before.
> 
> 
> Andreas -- how tough would it be to make such a plugin for the Mac? 
> Can I help?
>