> > Actually, Squeak does support temporary block variables.
>
> Eh, sort of, yes. But only by making them temps of the method in
> which the block occurs, yes? (You should know :)) The temps aren't
> local to the block, right?

	That's right. If you don't need a distinct variable in an inner scope with the same name as one in an outer scope, you won't notice.


-C

p.s. Don't get me started about "good enough" in Squeak...



--
Craig Latta
composer and computer scientist
craig.latta at netjam.org
www.netjam.org
latta at interval.com
Smalltalkers do: [:it | All with: Class, (And love: it)]