Dear Squeakers,

I've just downloaded a *very* large mail with 1291033 octets, so the
downloading problem described in a previous mail (see below) doesn't
seem to be a mail provider problem.

But I want to know more, because
- I've had this problem before with a mail from this ML,
- fear to miss mails from this ML,
- it makes work to remove the 'bad' mails from the server of my mail
provider.

So I ask again:

Did you have problems downloading the *large* 0.5MB mail from Brent
called probably
	[ANN] NeoSqueak v0.1 - explicit metaclass programming
or
	Re: [ANN] NeoSqueak v0.1 - explicit metaclass programming
or similar, resent date *about*
	14 Apr 2000 00:45:01 -0000
; or did you have *no* problems?

By what program do you fetch your mail?
For me it is fetchmail under Linux.

Regards,

Stephan


Taken from - one of the - mail(s) with subject:
	Re: [ANN] NeoSqueak v0.1 - explicit metaclass programming

Stephan Rudlof wrote:
> 
> Brent and others,
> 
> there is another eMail from you with a SIZE=513224 at my eMail-provider
> and I'm not able to download it (with fetchmail under Linux).
> 
> - Does anybody have similar problems?
> 
> Brent:
> 
> Wouldn't it be possible to put such a *large* file at a web server and
> to post a link to this location to this mailing list instead of this
> *large* file?
> 
> I think about 100k is a reasonable limit for files to this mailing list.
> 
> Other opinions?
> 
> Greetings,
> 
> Stephan
>  
> --
> Stephan Rudlof (sr at evolgo.de)
>    "Genius doesn't work on an assembly line basis.
>     You can't simply say, 'Today I will be brilliant.'"
>     -- Kirk, "The Ultimate Computer", stardate 4731.3

-- 
Stephan Rudlof (sr at evolgo.de)
   "Genius doesn't work on an assembly line basis.
    You can't simply say, 'Today I will be brilliant.'"
    -- Kirk, "The Ultimate Computer", stardate 4731.3