URL exceptions (was: Re: implementing sandboxes with capabilities)
Michael Rueger
m.rueger at acm.org
Tue Apr 11 20:20:44 UTC 2000
Lex Spoon wrote:
> When the URL code was written, there were no exceptions. Thus when an
> error happens, it just returns a string with hte error message in it.
> This works okay for a web browser, but is clearly suboptimal.
> Now that we have exceptions, that stuff should be rewritten to throw an
> exception if anything goes wrong. Plus Scamper should be rewritten to
> catch those exceptions and do something about it.
>
> Any takers? :)
Hmm, I thought about doing this, but then the whole socket and protocol
code needs a complete rewrite IMHO.
And there is the newer stuff in PWS and Comanche.
Any idea how to integrate these two development branches?
Michael
--
"To improve is to change, to be perfect is to change often."
Winston Churchill
+------------------------------------------------------------+
| Michael Rueger m.rueger at acm.org ++1 (310) 937 7196 |
+------------------------------------------------------------+
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|