ifNil, ifNotNil

Eric Arseneau eat at huv.com
Thu Aug 3 18:30:15 UTC 2000


> I, too, years ago implemented ifNotNil: with an optional argument.
>
> For Squeak, I happily use ifNotNilDo:.  It is not as generic, but it saves
> an argument count test.  Now if only it were transformed, too...

Hi Jim,

I will work on the transform now.  The transform will get rid of the need
for testing for 0 vs 1 arguments.

I am assuming that no one will mind and sees no problems with this ???





More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list