Squeak IDE Look-n-Feel

Bruce ONeel beoneel at mindspring.com
Tue Dec 12 09:19:22 UTC 2000


Hi,
  It might be worth playing within Morphic rather than MVC.
In my mind Morphic is much nicer looking.  Also play
with the preferences and see what make you happy.

cheers

bruce

ajalis at twu.net wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 11, 2000 at 08:46:48PM -0500, Ted Wright wrote:
> > ajalis at twu.net wrote:
> > > How about integrating Squeak with WxWindows (http://www.wxwindows.org). 
> > 
> > I don't think it is a good match. I have some experience with using wxWindows
> > with Python. Squeak is far more portable, and already provides the wxWindows
> > features except native widgets. Because it support so many native widgets,
> > wxWindows has a least-common-denominator feel to it. wxWindows also has 
> > a very Microsoft MFC feel to it (which I don't like). 
> > 
> > Squeak, especially Morphic, is different. Squeak seems to want to push the 
> > envelope on GUI matters, and this just doesn't fit in well with native widgets. 
> 
> I see your point. I need to spend more time playing with Squeak's look-n-feel.
> 
> Asim





More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list