How about Smalltalk-2000?
Stefan Matthias Aust
sma at 3plus4.de
Sat Feb 19 12:59:05 UTC 2000
At 19:19 17.02.00 +0000, Hans-Martin Mosner wrote:
>Although I really don't need a different Smalltalk syntax, this is a nice
>homework example on how you can make the system suit your needs.
Cool! I'd really like to try out this change for []-collection access as
well as Warrens other suggestions for (in IHHO) more readable control flow
language. That change should be simple to do although it makes it
impossible to use "repeat, for, while, if, and switch" as local or instance
variables... not that is would have been very likely but it adds to the
number of reserved words (self, super, nil, true, false, thisContext).
bye
--
Stefan Matthias Aust // ...dancing on the Darkside of the Moon
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|