Stephan Rudlof wrote:
> 
> What do you think of enhancing readability by using the escape character
> *twice* as braces around characters which denote special characters
> like:
> 
> value   -> value
> value:  -> value_c_
> at:put: -> at_c_put_c_
> ==      -> _ee_
> <=      -> _le_
> ugly_accessor_method    -> ugly___accessor___method
> 
> and multiple '_':
> 
> very__ugly__accessor__method    -> very____ugly____accessor____method
> or
> very__ugly__accessor__method    -> very_uu_ugly_uu_accessor_uu_method
> (u for underline).
> 

I've been catched by the ambiguity problem:

If using multiple '_' like in the first case
	problemAccessor_:eee:
translated to
	-> problemAccessor____c_eee_c_
could also mean
	problemAccessor__c===c_
.

So its better to use the second variant
	-> problemAccessor_u__c_eee_c_
which should work.


Stephan
-- 
Stephan Rudlof (sr at evolgo.de)
   "Genius doesn't work on an assembly line basis.
    You can't simply say, 'Today I will be brilliant.'"
    -- Kirk, "The Ultimate Computer", stardate 4731.3