CLOS, MOP, AOP, SOP
Michael Lucas-Smith
ich at driftwood.darktech.org
Mon Jul 10 00:28:19 UTC 2000
Mats Nygren wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Has anyone worked with MOP or other CLOS-ideas in Squeak?
>
> Is somebody interested in this?
>
> Among other things there is the CLOS concept of having a metaclass
> associated with classes, not to be confused with the Smalltalk concept
> with the same name. This seems to be an opening for trying out different
> language ideas within a reasonably ordered basic framework.
>
> Some, in particular Alan Kay, mentions fences in relation to flexibility of
> language structures. The CLOS' MOP addressed that, are you not satisfied with
> that organisation?
>
> If I understand it correctly the CLOS-people have moved on to AOP. Are
> there any hints on getting into this, especially within the Squeak-system?
>
> And then there is the idea called SOP, anything you wish to share on that?
>
> /Mats
AOP.. Aspect Oriented Programming? or Agent Oriented Programming?
Michael.
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|