[SF][VM] better directory structure
Ned Konz
ned at bike-nomad.com
Thu Jul 20 15:36:35 UTC 2000
Stephan Rudlof wrote:
>
> Dear VM'ers!
>
> To ease the automatic generation of arbitrary combinations of internal
> and external plugins,
> I would like to change the structure from the current
>
> Unix_2.8
> conf
> src
> CoreVM
> InternalModules
> BitBltPlugin.c
> ExternalModules
> SocketPlugin
> SocketPlugin.c SocketPlugin.h sqUnixNetwork.c
>
> to the easier to realize evolutionary
>
> Unix_2.8
> conf
> src
> CoreVM
> InternalModules
> BitBltPlugin
> BitBltPlugin.c
> ExternalModules
> SocketPlugin
> SocketPlugin.c SocketPlugin.h
> SupportForModules
> SocketPlugin
> sqUnixNetwork.c
>
> or to the better IMHO
>
> Unix_2.8
> conf
> src
> CoreVM
> Modules
> BitBltPlugin
> Internal
> BitBltPlugin.c
> SocketPlugin
> External
> SocketPlugin.c SocketPlugin.h
> Support
> sqUnixNetwork.c
> .
>
> To the latter:
> - From Squeak there could be a direct removing/generation of the
> Modules/*/Internal and Modules/*/External substructures without
> affecting the Modules/*/Support part;
> - could serve as a basis for a good platform independent SF structure,
> just think of separating the .../Support part for every platform;
> - drawback: many makefile/config changes are necessary...
Same arguments hold for the first structure.
I think the first is better, as it will result in a simpler CVS
Modules file.
--
Ned Konz
currently: Stanwood, WA
email: ned at bike-nomad.com
homepage: http://bike-nomad.com
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|