Syntax & Sematics [was: Re: [Enough already] Re: Proposal3:
Stephan Rudlof
sr at evolgo.de
Mon Jun 5 23:16:09 UTC 2000
Tim,
Tim Rowledge wrote:
>
> In message <393B0FB2.E21BE874 at evolgo.de> you wrote:
>
> > If the second expression should be a Smalltalk example, it could be more
> > difficult for e.g. C programmers:
> Since C makes it difficult for C programmers, why should we go to any
> effort to make it just as difficult? Smalltalk is Smalltalk. If you want
> C++/java/snobol/Trac(c)/ObjectiveFortran++ then use it.
I like to use Squeak!
I just wanted to make the example
(2*x)+(2*y)
to a more ST'ish
2*x + (2*y)
.
I have to admit, this may be a little bit pedantic...
Stephan
>
> --
> Tim Rowledge, tim at sumeru.stanford.edu, http://sumeru.stanford.edu/tim
> Strange OpCodes: IAM: Increase Amperage Above Maximum
--
Stephan Rudlof (sr at evolgo.de)
"Genius doesn't work on an assembly line basis.
You can't simply say, 'Today I will be brilliant.'"
-- Kirk, "The Ultimate Computer", stardate 4731.3
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|