Syntax & Sematics [was: Re: [Enough already] Re: Proposal3:

Stephan Rudlof sr at evolgo.de
Mon Jun 5 23:16:09 UTC 2000


Tim,

Tim Rowledge wrote:
> 
> In message <393B0FB2.E21BE874 at evolgo.de> you wrote:
> 
> > If the second expression should be a Smalltalk example, it could be more
> > difficult for e.g. C programmers:
> Since C makes it difficult for C programmers, why should we go to any
> effort to make it just as difficult? Smalltalk is Smalltalk. If you want
> C++/java/snobol/Trac(c)/ObjectiveFortran++ then use it.

I like to use Squeak!

I just wanted to make the example
	(2*x)+(2*y)
to a more ST'ish
	2*x + (2*y)
.

I have to admit, this may be a little bit pedantic...

Stephan

> 
> --
> Tim Rowledge, tim at sumeru.stanford.edu, http://sumeru.stanford.edu/tim
> Strange OpCodes: IAM: Increase Amperage Above Maximum

-- 
Stephan Rudlof (sr at evolgo.de)
   "Genius doesn't work on an assembly line basis.
    You can't simply say, 'Today I will be brilliant.'"
    -- Kirk, "The Ultimate Computer", stardate 4731.3





More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list