Goodness, how many custom filters do you have?  I tend to have about
10-20--one for each list--and so no subset is really useful. 

Incidentally, there are other ways to filter thinsg than the named
custom filters.  First, filtering based on from and subject is already
pretty easy, because you can click on one candidate message and the
supplied filter is usually correct.  Second, it would be quite nice to
have a "mailing list" filter which acts similarly.  Most messages on a
mailing list have the name of hte mailing list in the header somewhere,
under something like X-Mailing-List.  If Celeste could grok this header
like it does From and Subject, then most of my custom filters would
disappear.  I'm sure others would see the same thing.


Finally, it's already pretty easy already to select a filter and then do
move-all.  Along the lines you are discussing, how about just having the
top option in the "move all" menu be the name of the filter that is
currently selected?


-Lex



danielv at netvision.net.il wrote:
> 
> --==CelesteAttachment69228==
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
> 
> "Change Set:		CustomFilterMove
> Date:			4 June 2000
> Author:			Daniel Vainsencher
> 
> (Karl made me think...)
> Filtering read mail is now quick and painless -
> 
> Pressing the new Custom F. Move button will present a subset of the
> custom filters defined - those named like an existing category. Choosing
> a filter will move all matching messages to the appropriate category.
> 
> A category menu option called edit category filter allows you to
> immidiately define/edit a filter for that category.
> 
> Remember to close and open Celeste so it'll create the new button."!