[ENH]Latest benchmarks package
Tim Rowledge
tim at sumeru.stanford.edu
Tue May 30 22:31:01 UTC 2000
Thanks to Helge, my minor porting job on the old Green Book benchmarks
has been brought up to 2.8 capability.
http://sumeru.stanford.edu/tim/pooters/SqFiles/deltas/sqBenchmarks.cs
Just FYI, my 5 year old Acorn, running a 200MHz cpu with 16Kb(count'em!)
caches, 16MHz memory and no FPU compiled with a four year old
compiler gets:-
BitBLT 158.3333333333333
TextScanning 31200.0
ClassOrganizer 238.1889763779527
PrintDefinition 555.5555555555555
PrintHierachy 1162.790697674418
AllCallsOn 48.7540628385699
AllImplementors 179.5580110497238
Inspect 298.360655737705
Compiler 524.705882352941
Decompiler 248.0
KeyboardLookAhead 236.1111111111111
KeyboardSingle 262.019230769231
TextDisplay 126.1083743842364
TextFormatting 404.9295774647886
TextEditing 362.2317596566523
Performance Rating 367.0434379525636261594634083
and 0 tinyBenchmarks returns
10322580 bytecodes/sec and 373349 sends.sec
whereas my brand new 600MHz pentium3 with 1Mb caches, 133MHz memory and
an fpu compiled on the latest gcc gets
BitBLT 1257.48502994012
TextScanning 43943.661971831
ClassOrganizer 1495.488814732419
PrintDefinition 4607.046070460704
PrintHierachy 7507.50750750751
AllCallsOn 313.7583015217277
AllImplementors 1791.62072767365
Inspect 2721.29186602871
Compiler 4188.580015026296
Decompiler 1798.404641044235
KeyboardLookAhead 3143.491124260355
KeyboardSingle 2625.2408477842
TextDisplay 734.155434470892
TextFormatting 3954.607977991747
TextEditing 2136.708860759493
Performance Rating 2600.91381625157627578
and 0 tinyBenchmarks returns
44475330 bytecodes/sec and 1458439 sends.sec
Not too bad.
--
Tim Rowledge, tim at sumeru.stanford.edu, http://sumeru.stanford.edu/tim
It's 10 o'clock. Do you know where your child processes are?
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|