Socket Exceptions (was: Re: POP/SMTP without user interaction?)
Michael Rüger
m.rueger at acm.org
Tue May 30 16:29:21 UTC 2000
Stefan Matthias Aust wrote:
> Has anybody already changed things like POPSocket and SMTPSocket so
> that they'll work in a GUI-less environment? At the moment, both
> classes will prompt the user in #waitForDataQueryingUserEvery:
> which is, well, not the best idea. I also dislike that this method
> will emit errors using #error: instead of generating more appropriate
> SocketExceptions.
We should start with defining some basic socket exceptions:
- connection timed out
- connection refused
- connection closed
- host not responding
Please add to the list :-)
Michael
--
+------------------------------------------------------------+
| Michael Rueger m.rueger at acm.org ++49-391-733 9808 |
+------------------------------------------------------------+
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|