Q for Celeste users

Lex Spoon lex at cc.gatech.edu
Tue Sep 19 19:43:33 UTC 2000

Bob Arning <arning at charm.net> wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Sep 2000 17:28:56 -400 "Lex Spoon" <lex at cc.gatech.edu> wrote:
> >So I'm guessing there is some application of Celeste that we're wanting
> >to use here?  For example, the ability to email a Squeak page to
> >someone?!  For such applications, it seems perfectly appropriate to use
> >plugin-specific EMAIL.xxx files.
> That's right. However, the selection of email file names is an image
> decision and I'm currently using the same image in both browser and non-browser modes. 


	a) Why insist on having the same image for the plugin and for hacking?

	b) Why use Celeste, instead of using SMTPSocket directly?  Why store
email messages on disk from a plugin?


More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list