Pink Squeak (was Re: Stable Squeak?)

Robert D. Church churchr at ghostbitch.org
Thu Apr 19 15:38:19 UTC 2001


How about "Solid Squeak"?

On Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 09:41:01AM -0400, Jarvis, Robert P. (Contingent) quipped:
> BizSqueak?  (Sounds a bit like "Bisquick" :-)
> 
> Bob Jarvis
> Compuware @ Timken
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: John M McIntosh [mailto:johnmci at smalltalkconsulting.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2001 2:38 AM
> > To: squeak at cs.uiuc.edu
> > Subject: Re: Pink Squeak (was Re: Stable Squeak?)
> > 
> > 
> > >"Pink Squeak" as the new name for the version of Squeak targeted 
> > >toward business/commercial use?  Hmm, "Squeak" by itself is already 
> > >a bit whimsical sounding, but this might push it a bit too far.  Why 
> > >not go all the way and just call it "Golden Twinkie" or "Frosty 
> > >Cuddles"? :)
> > 
> > Business Squeak?
> > 
> > -- 
> > --
> > ==============================================================
> > =============
> > John M. McIntosh <johnmci at smalltalkconsulting.com> 1-800-477-2659
> > Corporate Smalltalk Consulting Ltd.  
> > http://www.smalltalkconsulting.com
> > ==============================================================
> > =============
> > 
> 





More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list