General Stability of Squeak + Hi.
Andrew C. Greenberg
werdna at mucow.com
Mon Aug 13 00:50:54 UTC 2001
> I'm new to squeak as well as this list, so hello to everyone. As a
> child, I had a lot of fun programming systems, using basic, assembly
> language, and C. As an adult, I've made my living doing a variety of
> technical jobs, including programming c++, perl, and for the last
> couple of years, a load of java. I found myself drawn to computers as
> a child because I found them fun and a lot more stimulating than most
> of the other things around me. At work, I've managed to keep learning
> and diversifying my understanding. I often gain satifaction from my
> work, and I appreciate the beauty and intentions of all the languages
> I've programmed, but I haven't had a lot of real fun with them. I've
> finally found squeak, and so far I've not been disappointed - it's
> been stimulating, exiting and fun. I only wish I'd had it as a child.
>
> I was just wondering how stable I should expect squeak to be in
> general. I'm running 3.1, feb 28th, and I've had it crash on me a
> couple of times.
Working with Squeak for years now and, except when building and
debugging machine language plugins or a few tricks at the interstices of
a test pilot revision, it almost never crashes for me (except a few
expressions I have learned can make this happen). Can you tell us a bit
more about your configuration?
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|