[Modules] Getting on a common page
Andrew C. Greenberg
werdna at mucow.com
Thu Aug 16 22:16:35 UTC 2001
I can't begin to tell you how exciting it is to see these super-powers
of language design putting their collective heads together on these
important questions. Who says an open source collaborative model
doesn't work?
I'm not worthy!
Welcome, and thanks.
A
On Thursday, August 16, 2001, at 12:49 PM, Allen Wirfs-Brock wrote:
> Since Dan and Dave Thomas asked me to participate in this discussion
> I've been thinking how I could best contribute. As I'm not going to
> have the time to actually implement anything I think the roles I can
> probably play are tour guide and ideologist. This is a lot of work,
> good ideas, and experience both inside and outside the Smalltalk
> community relating to modularity. As a tour guide I can make some of
> this visible and perhaps provide some interpretation.
>
> Smalltalk is built upon an ideology of objects. The ideology binds the
> community giving them a common perspective on computing and a common
> language to communicate about computation. In looking at the on going
> discussions on the [Modules] topic it's easy to see that there isn't
> yet a common ideology of Modules for Squeak. You need one!
>
> The potential scope covered by the subject heading "modularity" is
> huge. It essentially covers every aspect of what used to be call
> "programming in large". As I was composing my thoughts on things I
> would like to share with this list I realized that I was developing the
> mental outline of what could be a book length work. In order to make
> progress we are going to have to focus on the essentials. Henrick has
> already said as much:
>
>> I previously (off-list, not your fault that you didn't get it) argued
>> that
>> we need to modularize the modularity effort itself, if we are to ever
>> get
>> anything done. To do so we need separable, small, incremental steps.
>> We need
>> to identify the 'core' that must be done and should be done first.
>
> I heartily agree. I would urge everybody with an interest in this area
> to focus, for the next few weeks, on defining that core.
>
> Allen
>
>
>
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|