Release 3.1 or 3.2?

Bijan Parsia bparsia at email.unc.edu
Sun Dec 2 18:30:31 UTC 2001


On Sun, 2 Dec 2001, Dan Ingalls wrote:
[snip]
> No, I would name it 3.2, since that's what it is.  It's beginning to
> look like I have a thing about even numbers.  (Goes all the way back
> to ST-72, -74, -76, -78 and ST-80 ;-).

Isn't the Linux kernal versioning scheme something like, if even, it's
stable; if odd, BOOM?

Cheers,
Bijan Parsia.





More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list